While playing hockey, you are always at risk of injury. Yet you're team will take this fact and accept it. But while you're playing and representing your country at the international level, not all people may accept this fact. On February 19, 2014 during the second period of the men's quarter-final ice hockey, Islanders captain John Tavares took a hit from Latvian defensemen Arturs Kulda into the boards, with his knee being the first point of contact. What happened next was sad news for Islanders fans as he sustained a torn MCL and torn meniscus in his knee and would miss the remainder of the NHL season. People were saddened by the news but what people were more concerned about was will NHL teams still send players when they are at that risk? Islanders GM Garth Snow was asked about the situation and responded with "They want all the benefits from NHL players in Olympics and don't want to pay when our best player gets hurt". If this risk continues to get worst, we might see the end of NHL players in the Olympics in which I hope never happens but anything can happen with the good ol' hockey game.
The average temperature during February in South Korea is 0.4 Celsius. Its not your typical weather for a Winter Olympics which arouses the question, will it promote ice hockey in Asia. According to Wikipedia, there is an Asia Ice Hockey League (ALH) which consists of seven teams from Japan, China and South Korea. This league has been operating since 2003 and has seen a high of nine teams since it began. This isn't the best place to represent hockey so why should the worlds most elite hockey players go? People say that it'll help "promote" ice hockey in Asia. But lets look at the big picture here, it could take years before hockey in Asia starts to grow and it would take even longer before the NHL started to accept players from these countries. Sending NHL players to South Korea would be waste of time for players and would see the lowest number of television watchers.
Zero. The worst number the NHL sees, espicially in the profit section. The NHL makes nothing from the Olympics, no money, nothing. So why continue sending your players even if you don't make money? Just because they're representing their country? The solution to this problem for the NHL is the World Cup of Hockey. The WCH has been seen twice, once in 1998 and finally in 2004. This event is the ultimate solution for the NHL. First of all, the NHL makes profit from it because they're the ones who run it whereas the Olympics are run by the IOC. Second of all, the WHC runs during the offseason without causing conflicts in schedules whereas the Olympics run through the NHL season causing the NHL to stop its season for two weeks just for the Olympics. The WHC would solve all of the NHL problems by giving them profit from their tournament and wouldn't lose them money by stopping their schedule for two weeks.
In conclusion, the NHL should not go the 2018 Winter Olympics in South Korea because players are at risk of injury, they won't be promoting hockey in Asia and the NHL is losing money due to the Olympics. With already many injuries occurring already and money being lost from teams who don't get enough fans for games, the sending of players to South Korea would be a lost to the NHL instead of a gain, so will the NHL continue it's era of Olympic hockey or end it all at home?